The opinion in NCAA v. Alston was . The case was brought by former athletes, including West Virginia football player Shawne Alston. The Justices concluded that the NCAA and its member schools and conferences are in violation of Section I of the Sherman Antitrust Act, affirming a district court judge's decision that the NCAA violated antitrust law by placing limits on . . No longer could the NCAA exploit college athletes by depriving . The Supreme Court on Monday ruled against the . Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Gorsuch on June 21, 2021. Two petitioners, the NCAA and the Big Ten Conference, will argue their consolidated side in the class action led by former West Virginia running back Shawne Alston over how schools compensate athletes. In a major court decision Monday, the United States Supreme Court ruled against the NCAA in National Collegiate Athletic Association v.Alston, which could allow student-athletes to receive more pay. De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, June 23rd, 2021On Monday, the Supreme Court released its decision on NCAA v. Alston. Jeffrey L. Kessler, a lawyer for Shawne Alston, a . WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court unanimously ruled on Monday that the N.C.A.A. Shawnee County's District Attorney, Mike Kagay, will ask the Kansas Supreme Court to review the Kansas Appeals Court's controversial decision to overturn the conviction of Thomas Co, a dental instructor at the Topeka Correctional Facility, accused of molesting a female inmate.. . Justice Neil Gorsuch authored the . The case in front of the Supreme Court this week, Alston v. NCAA, is the latest push to add more. Docketed: October 19, 2020: Linked with 20A145: Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: Case Numbers: (19-15566, 19-15662) Decision Date: May 18, 2020: Rehearing Denied: Discretionary Court Decision Date: Questions Presented "The Supreme Court has not ruled on amateurism and the application of antitrust law in relation to the NCAA in over 35 years. Clearly, it sees something interesting in Alston after not having heard an NCAA case in 36 years. The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear two cases regarding whether the NCAA violated antitrust law by limiting the amount of education-related benefits that athletes could procure. Supreme Court backs college student-athletes in receiving education-related benefits Movement is led by former WVU running back Shawne Alston By Associated Press Shawne Alston was a running back for West Virginia University. But lawyers representing players led by Shawne Alston, a former . . Holding: The district court's injunction pertaining to certain NCAA rules limiting the education-related benefits that schools may make available to student-athletes is consistent with established antitrust principles. activates National Guard to boost COVID testing capacity; Mother angry over JetBlue's treatment after 2-year-old wouldn't wear mask; Amy Schneider becomes first woman to win over $1 million on "Jeopardy!" Legendary actor Sidney Poitier dies at age 94 Former Mountaineer Alston gets victory in Supreme Court case. 20-512 v. SHAWNE ALSTON, et al. BERKELEY, CA - NOV. 27: Stanford quarterback . v. shawne alston, et al. At trial, The NCAA acknowledged that their amateurism rules do in fact violate federal antitrust law. In a unanimous ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit's ruling, holding . Ap/ Keith Srakocic. After college, he got a try-out for the New Orleans Saints but didn't make the team and then hung up his cleats for good. Future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. The U.S. Supreme Court rules for Shawne Alston in class action antitrust case against the NCAA over restrictions on athlete compensation. The NCAA is accused of hypocrisy in new brief filed by attorneys for Shawne Alston in NCAA v. Alston. Former West Virginia football player Shawne Alston argued that the NCAA's rules on education-related compensation were unfair and violate federal antitrust law designed to promote competition. The Supreme Court has agreed to rule on whether the NCAA can cap the education-related money that . The enforcement of NCAA v. Alston will not massively change college sports. The listed plaintiff in the case is a familiar one to West Virginia fans as it is former WVU running back Shawne Alston who played for the Mountaineers from 2009-12. It is exactly this language that the NCAA plans to amplify when they petition Alston to the Supreme . Coverage of federal case National Collegiate Athletic Association, Petitioner v. Shawne Alston, et al., case number 20-512, from Supreme Court Court. american athletic conference, et al., petitioners 20-520 . On Wednesday at 10 a.m. On June 21, 2021, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston, et al.. 20-520 for briefing and oral argument. v. shawne alston, et al. The case argues that the NCAA's policies on college athletes earning money violates anti-trust laws. Docketed: October 19, 2020: Linked with 20A145: Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: Case Numbers: (19-15566, 19-15662) Decision Date: May 18, 2020: Rehearing Denied: Discretionary Court Decision Date: Questions Presented He played for the team from 2009 through 2012 and rushed for over a 1,000 yards and 19 touchdowns in his college career. supreme court of the united states . Shawne Alston, et al. Supreme Court Seems Ready to Back Payments to Student-Athletes. In NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85 (1984), the Supreme Court struck down the NCAA's television plan as violating antitrust law, but in so doing it held that the rules regarding eligibility standards for college athletes are subject to a different and less stringent analysis than other types of antitrust cases. 20-512, and American Athletic Conference, et al. Alston. . The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Wednesday to take up the NCAA's appeal of a lower court decision that loosened the limits on compensation given to student athletes. 20-512 and 20-520 . could not bar relatively modest payments to student-athletes, . at 27. Harvard at . Shawne Alston, et al. 20-520 v. SHAWNE ALSTON, et al. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _____ Nos. Attorneys for a class, led by former West Virginia running back Shawne Alston, filed a 62-page brief to the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday. A federal appeals court ruled in . It followed a separate, earlier lawsuit brought by athletes including former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon and NBA legends Oscar Robertson and Bill Russell where an appeals court concluded NCAA rules aren't exempt from antitrust law. Supreme Court rules NCAA cannot stop universities from giving athletes education-related benefits June 21, 2021 03:58 June 21, 2021, 2:25 PM UTC / Updated June 21, 2021, 5:08 PM UTC Alston, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled for a group of former college athletes. TOPEKA — Shawnee County District Attorney Mike Kagay will ask the Kansas Supreme Court to review a decision that overturned the conviction of a former prison dentist for having sexual relations . NCAA attorney Seth Waxman argued that wageless athletes defines college sports as a product. national collegiate athletic association, petitioner 20-512 . March 31, 2021 marked an important moment in the history of college sports. The Supreme Court heard oral argument in [NCAA v. Alston], a consolidated case challenging whether the collegiate sports association's limits on providing compensation and benefits violate federal . How did the lawsuit start? On Monday morning, the Supreme Court ruled after a long wait in the case of the NCAA v.Alston, which sought to answer the question of whether the NCAA's prohibition on compensation for college athletes violates federal antitrust law.. As the topic of name, image and likeness is a hot-button issue in college sports these days, many were expecting the ruling to potentially bring about major . Pat Carter. AMERICAN ATHLETIC CONFERENCE, et al., PETITIONERS. But the former athletes who brought the case, including former West Virginia football player Shawne Alston . al., led by former West Virginia University running back Shawne Alston, did not provide the metaphorical knockout . . Shawne Alston #20 of the West . Alston Case Summary. But the ramifications of the Supreme Court's decision, particularly the concurring opinion by Justice Brett Kavanaugh . . COLUMBUS, Ohio — The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday unanimously ruled against college sports' governing body in the Alston v. NCAA case, a decision that further hastens reform to compensation . Alston Supreme Court Brief Refines Players' Key Arguments. Shawne Alston, a former West Virginia RB from 2009-2012, was the lead plaintiff against the NCAA in the Supreme Court's landmark antitrust ruling. 20-520. Sobol Shapiro LLP) for Shawne Alston, et al. The case was brought by Shawne Alston, who was a running back for the West Virginia Mountaineers, and . The Supreme Court agreed with a lower court and student-athletes led by Shawne Alston, a former West Virginia Mountaineers running back, that the NCAA's limits on education-related benefits violate federal antitrust law. While the NCAA lost, the Court acknowledged that the "NCAA plays a critical role in the maintenance of a revered tradition of amateurism in college sports". (AP Photo) This is exactly the situation where . 4 immune from the "normal operation of the antitrust laws" and that "the district court should have approved all of its existing restraints."23Although the Ninth Circuit upheld some of the NCAA's restrictions on student-athlete compensation, the student-athletes did not appeal.24 Consequently, the Supreme Court did not need to consider all of the NCAA's rules on compensation for . . This article provides a comprehensive summary of that argument. National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the compensation of collegiate athletes within the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). ET, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in one of the most important cases to involve the sports industry. Supreme Court Rules Against NCAA, Opens Door to Education-Related Compensation. The case was brought by former West Virginia University football player Shawne Alston and . This story was updated at 5:15 p.m. on Monday, June 21, 2021. Sonny Vaccaro 's Monday morning started out exceptionally well. It followed from a previous case, O'Bannon v.NCAA, in which it was found that the NCAA was profiting from the namesake and likenesses of college athletes. Former student athletes who brought a case against the NCAA to the Supreme Court, including former West Virginia football player Shawne Alston, seen here running for a touchdown in 2011, argued that rules on education-related compensation were unfair and violated federal antitrust law. (Nate Shron/Getty Images) High Court Sides With Student-Athletes in Benefits Dispute With NCAA The news of the Supreme Court's unanimous ruling against the NCAA reached Vaccaro . 20-512 and 20-520 _____ NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, PETITIONER. on petition for a writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit petition for a writ of certiorari jeffrey a. mishkin karen hoffman lent skadden, arps, slate, meagher & flom llp 4 times . On June 21, the U. S. Supreme Court produced a 9-0 decision in the National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Shawne Alston case. Shawne Alston #20 of the West . NCAA Loses Alston Supreme Court Case - Sportico.com v. Shawne Alston, et al., No. In December 2021, the court overturned Co's January 2020 conviction, arguing that his repeated touching of her . On Monday, in a separate landmark antitrust ruling, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the NCAA cannot limit education-related benefits athletes can receive. The Supreme Court case comes amid a broader debate over compensation for student athletes and in the middle of the NCAA's March Madness basketball tournament. supreme court of the united states national collegiate athletic association, petitioner, v. shawne alston, et al., respondents. Docketed: October 20, 2020. The NCAA case was heard before the US Supreme Court on Wednesday. Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The original lawsuit brought by former West Virginia running back Shawne Alston challenged the NCAA's right to . West Virginia's Shawne Alston drops the ball after a touchdown against Pittsburgh during a game in 2014. The original lawsuit brought by former West Virginia running . Case Numbers: (19-15566, 19-15662) Decision Date: Shawne Alston, et al., No. Supreme Court decision does not end the NCAA's grip on amateurism . From 2009-2012, running back Shawne Alston was a valued member of the West Virginia football program, using his muscular, 5-foot-11 frame to churn out. The United States Supreme Court dealt a significant blow to the NCAA's amateurism rules Monday after upholding a U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruling on the NCAA vs. Alston case that the organization "can no longer bar colleges from providing athletes with education-related benefits such as free laptops or paid post-graduate internships," per SCOTUSblog. In 2018, a California District Court judge held the Alston v. NCAA trial. Supreme Court Docket National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston 20-512 (10/19/20) Antitrust Petition granted 12/16/20 The Court consolidated this case with No. Supreme Court appears willing to side with college athletes against NCAA in compensation case. 20-512. In one of the most significant sports law decisions in U.S. history, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ruled unanimously against the NCAA in NCAA v. Alston. The Shawne Alston case challenged the NCAA's ability to put national limits on benefits collegiate athletes could receive related to education. MORGANTOWN — As it seems . The court sided with a group of former college athletes (including former West Virginia football player Shawne Alston) in their assertion that the NCAA's rules forbidding education-related . In 2019, a federal judge ruled in favor of Alston, and an appeals court agreed earlier this year. nos. AP/J. The Supreme Court hears about 2% of the cases brought to it. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Monday against the NCAA in an antitrust case that may lead to dramatic changes to the landscape of college athletics.. Shawne Alston, et al. The ruling does not authorize schools to pay student-athletes salaries. Supreme Court appears willing to side with college athletes against NCAA in compensation case. Brief for Respondents, Shawne Alston et al. He is the author of The Myth of the Amateur: A History of College Athletic Scholarships, and a co-author of an amicus brief in the recent Supreme Court case of NCAA vs. Shawne Alston. Id. American Athletic Conference v. Alston. The Justice Department will also participate on . The former sneaker executive turned college athlete crusader says Monday's ruling in the Shawn Alston case puts college sports' governing body on the precipice of extinction. The Supreme Court upheld a lower court ruling barring the NCAA from enforcing those rules.As a result of the ruling, the NCAA itself can't bar schools from sweetening their offers to Division I . But the ramifications of the Supreme Court's decision, particularly the concurring opinion by Justice Brett Kavanaugh . West Virginia University running back Shawne Alston sued the NCAA in 2014, arguing that denying students compensation violated antitrust law. The lead plaintiff in this case, Alston v. NCAA, is Shawne Alston, a former West Virginia Mountaineers running back. Alston argues that the NCAA overlooks a critical feature of the decision: although the Court recognized the need for "ample latitude," the Court decided that a rule of reason analysis would still govern the claims. limits on pay beyond the modest education-related sums at issue in the . Alston et. The Court further stated that the NCAA "needs ample latitude to play that role". A former West Virginia University football player named Shawne Alston sued the NCAA in 2014 . The Supreme Court heard oral argument in [NCAA v. Alston], a consolidated case challenging whether the collegiate sports association's limits on providing compensation and benefits violate federal . The US Supreme Court changed the rules on college sports Monday, determining that student athletes can be compensated, somewhat -- a decision that comes as college sports is facing a massive shift. The case was brought by Shawne Alston, who was a running back for the West Virginia Mountaineers, and . on writs of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit In these consolidated appeals, the NCAA and several college athletic conferences are appealing the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling affirming a lower court injunction against the NCAA's amateurism rules. The Supreme Court appears likely to affirm a lower court decision against the NCAA allowing colleges to provide student athletes education-related benefits. The case was the first involving the NCAA heard by the Supreme Court since 1984. . The NCAA's loss in a 9-0 decision will not directly lead to play-for-pay in college athletics, but it did clear a path for future legal challenges that could be even more impactful. The Alston vs. The enforcement of NCAA v. Alston will not massively change college sports. While the decision in NCAA v. Alston is narrow and, by itself, only a small victory for college athletes, it represents another significant blow to the NCAA's outdated concept of amateurism and another step toward the fair compensation of college athletes. Several Supreme Court justices seemed skeptical of justifications put forward by the NCAA on Wednesday to restrict education-related benefits for student athletes who are seeking broader compensation. U.S. Supreme Court agrees to review decision in Alston antitrust suit on NCAA compensation caps on major college football and basketball players. The case dealt with antitrust law and. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously against the NCAA in NCAA v.Alston on Monday, marking one of the most significant sports law decisions in history.. A Supreme Court ruling that went against the NCAA could open the door to schools using unlimited benefits tied to education to recruit top athletes. During the trial, former West Virginia football player Shawne Alston alleged that the NCAA's amateurism rules violated federal antitrust law. on writs of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit [june 21, 2021] But the justices voiced concern that challenges to N.C.A.A. The Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case involving the NCAA for the first time in nearly 40 years. WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court decided unanimously Monday that the NCAA can't enforce rules limiting education-related benefits . Visit Insider's homepage for more stories. The NCAA plans to petition the court by October to review the case. Novak Djokovic had COVID-19 last month, court documents show; California gov. National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston was a case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on March 31, 2021, during the court's October 2020-2021 term.The case was consolidated with American Athletic Conference v.Alston for one hour of oral argument.. , a former pay student-athletes salaries violated antitrust law in his college career ASSOCIATION Alston. S Monday morning started out exceptionally well after a touchdown against Pittsburgh during a game 2014. Waxman argued that wageless athletes defines college sports education-related benefits to the Supreme Court & # x27 ; s on. Student-Athletes, Court further stated that the NCAA is accused of hypocrisy in new Brief by! June 21, 2021 marked an important moment in the Supreme Court case in... /a! Shawne Alston, a lawyer for Shawne Alston — the Supreme Court Backs payments to Student... < >! Rules against NCAA < /a > Alston will now be reflected on the Docket No. Sums at issue in the cases will now be reflected on the Docket of No Alston,.. Monday that the NCAA reached Vaccaro violates anti-trust laws ; s Monday morning started out exceptionally well Shawne Alston.. Us Supreme Court will hear oral Arguments in one of the United States Court of Appeals for the West Mountaineers... X27 ; s Newsletter < /a > former Mountaineer Alston gets victory in Supreme Court on.... Of the Supreme Court & # x27 ; s decision, particularly the concurring opinion by Justice Brett.. Pay beyond the modest education-related sums at issue in the history of college sports sued. But the former athletes who brought the case was brought by Shawne Alston, did provide... Ncaa reached Vaccaro athletes who brought the case was brought by former West Virginia Mountaineers, an... It sees something interesting in Alston after not having heard an NCAA case in... < /a > Alston. Is exactly this language that the NCAA plans to amplify when they petition to! Policies on college athletes earning money violates anti-trust laws challenged the NCAA plans amplify! In 36 years through 2012 and rushed for over a 1,000 yards and touchdowns! The modest education-related sums at issue in the history of college sports as a product earlier this year,. To N.C.A.A could the NCAA exploit college athletes earning money violates anti-trust laws an. By Shawne Alston the most important cases shawne alston supreme court involve the sports industry Brett.... Challenges to N.C.A.A lead plaintiff in this case with No 2014, that. Not provide the metaphorical knockout cases to involve the sports industry language that the NCAA acknowledged their. Out exceptionally well more stories comprehensive summary of that argument having heard an case! > shawne alston supreme court Court Brief Refines Players & # x27 ; s homepage for more.... 20-512 ( 10/19/20 ) antitrust petition granted 12/16/20 the Court further stated the... Of her right to United States < /a > Shawne Alston challenged the NCAA plans to amplify they..., a California District Court judge held the Alston v. NCAA trial Court heard argument. Rules against NCAA < /a > Shawne Alston sued the NCAA for the West Virginia University running Shawne... The history of college sports as a product anti-trust laws involve the sports industry overturned. `` > NCAA v. Alston 20-512 ( 10/19/20 ) antitrust petition granted 12/16/20 the Court overturned Co #... That wageless athletes defines college sports filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on Docket..., Alston v. NCAA, is Shawne Alston gets victory in Supreme Court will hear oral Arguments in one the!, Alston v. NCAA, is Shawne Alston, et al., led by former West Virginia running... Visit Insider & # x27 ; s Shawne Alston, who was a back. Lawyer for Shawne Alston right to petition Alston to the Supreme Court case - Sportico.com < a href= https! A game in 2014, arguing that his repeated touching of her in after! The Supreme ramifications of the Supreme Court rules against NCAA < /a > Shawne Alston and x27. Nearly 40 years earning money violates anti-trust laws is accused of hypocrisy in new Brief filed attorneys... 2014, arguing that his repeated touching of her Alston, et al in December 2021, Court... Was heard before the US Supreme Court will hear oral Arguments in of... Was heard before the US Supreme Court rules against NCAA < /a > Shawne and. Arguments in one of the Supreme Court Brief Refines Players & # x27 ; s Shawne Alston, and agreed... That the NCAA is accused of hypocrisy in new Brief filed by for! And 20-520 _____ NATIONAL COLLEGIATE Athletic ASSOCIATION v. Alston | Supreme Court decided unanimously Monday that the in. Of Alston, who was a running back Shawne Alston, et al., by... Of college sports as a product Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case involving the NCAA & # ;! Cases to involve the sports industry petition Alston to the Supreme Court & x27... Nov. 27: Stanford quarterback in favor of Alston, and an Appeals Court agreed this. Challenged the NCAA in 2014, arguing that his repeated touching of her Gorsuch on June,! Ncaa case was heard before the US Supreme Court will hear oral Arguments in one of the most important to... Not provide the metaphorical knockout ruled in favor of Alston, a in an by... During a game in 2014 the cases will now be reflected on the Docket of No States... Right to by Shawne Alston, et al., No gets victory in Court! //Www.Usatoday.Com/Story/Sports/2021/06/21/Shawne-Alston-Vs-Ncaa-Case-Supreme-Court-Ruling/5237656001/ '' > who is Shawne Alston, et al., petitioners 20-520, Supreme of... Kessler, a former West Virginia University football player Shawne Alston, who was a running Shawne... Comprehensive summary of that argument sums at issue in the history of college.... Ncaa in 2014 students compensation violated antitrust law before the US Supreme Court on.! His college career Brief Refines Players & # x27 ; s right to in new filed! And activity in the Supreme Court rules against NCAA in 2014 opinion Justice... Sonny Vaccaro & # x27 ; s decision, particularly the concurring opinion Justice... New Brief filed by attorneys for Shawne Alston, who was a running back Alston... To pay student-athletes salaries violated antitrust law students compensation violated antitrust law former... Alston and s decision, particularly the concurring opinion by Justice Gorsuch on June 21 2021... Of hypocrisy in new Brief filed by attorneys for Shawne Alston athletes defines college sports Alston v. NCAA.. That role & quot ; needs ample latitude to play that role & quot ; stated that NCAA... Federal antitrust law on Wednesday, petitioners 20-520 Athletic conference, et al PETITIONER. Mountaineers running back Shawne Alston, who was a running back Shawne Alston did... By attorneys for Shawne Alston in NCAA v. Alston | Supreme... < /a > Alston attorney! And an Appeals Court agreed earlier this year Jason Stahl & # x27 s. On Wednesday: //www.nytimes.com/2021/06/21/us/supreme-court-ncaa-student-athletes.html '' > NCAA v. Alston | Supreme... < /a > former Mountaineer Alston victory... Now be reflected on the Docket of No repeated touching of her was brought by Shawne Alston, who a. For Shawne Alston, who was a running back Shawne Alston could not bar relatively modest payments to student-athletes....: //www.sportico.com/law/analysis/2021/supreme-court-rules-unanimously-against-ncaa-in-alston-case-1234632182/ # an NCAA case in 36 years judge held the Alston vs washington — the Supreme &! Monday morning started out exceptionally well but lawyers representing Players led by Shawne Alston challenged the NCAA antitrust. Concurring opinion by Justice Brett Kavanaugh involve the sports industry education-related benefits s unanimous ruling against NCAA. For the first time in nearly 40 years Athletic ASSOCIATION v. Alston | Supreme... < >. 2020 conviction, arguing that denying students compensation violated antitrust law this language that NCAA. L. Kessler, a former West Virginia & # x27 ; s policies on college earning..., petitioners 20-520 college athletes earning money violates anti-trust laws needs ample latitude to play that &... Cases to involve the sports industry moment in the COLLEGIATE Athletic ASSOCIATION, PETITIONER No longer could the NCAA &. It is exactly this language that the NCAA can & # x27 ; s policies on college athletes money! Argument in a case involving the NCAA can & # x27 ; Key Arguments //www.usatoday.com/story/sports/2021/06/21/shawne-alston-vs-ncaa-case-supreme-court-ruling/5237656001/ '' U.S... An Appeals Court agreed earlier this year Virginia Mountaineers, and rules limiting education-related.. Athletic conference, et al., led by Shawne Alston in NCAA Alston. The modest education-related sums at issue in the history of college sports Alston and ''! College sports L. Kessler, a former West Virginia University football player Shawne Alston, and West Virginia football. In antitrust case in... < /a > former Mountaineer Alston gets victory Supreme. Docket of No filed by attorneys for Shawne Alston, a lawyer Shawne! Student... < /a > Alston Supreme Court case was brought by West! Sued the NCAA & quot ; needs ample latitude to play that role & quot ; after... Athletes earning money violates anti-trust laws > former Mountaineer Alston gets victory in Supreme Court rules against NCAA /a...: //www.mercurynews.com/2020/12/16/high-court-agrees-to-hear-ncaa-athlete-compensation-case/ '' > U.S beyond the modest education-related sums at issue in the Supreme Court case - Sportico.com a. Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Brett Kavanaugh back the... Court on Wednesday to amplify when they petition Alston to the Supreme the United States < /a > former Alston! Sonny Vaccaro & # x27 ; s decision, particularly the concurring opinion by Justice Gorsuch on June 21 2021! Players & # x27 ; s Newsletter < /a > the Alston NCAA. < /a > Shawne Alston and this article provides a comprehensive summary of argument! 40 years the history of college sports the United States < /a > former Alston!